La carne y lo irreversible del cuerpo pulsional
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2018-09-21
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Psicología. Departamento de Psicoanálisis
Abstract
Description
Con una metodología teórica examinamos a la visión comprendida en el espacio
merleau-pontyano; el objetivo es el de interrogar al excedente del cuerpo respecto
del imaginario especular. La reversibilidad
malograda entre lo activo y lo pasivo que
allí se vislumbra nos sirve de fundamento
para circunscribir al cuerpo pulsional en
su anclaje fantasmático. Nos apoyamos en
la distinción establecida por Merleau-Ponty entre la carne del cuerpo y la carne del
mundo para dilucidar la negatividad que
trabaja al cuerpo pulsional. La interferencia de la alteridad permite contraponerlo
al modo del cuerpo desprendido de su ontología de la carne, cuya réplica él pesquisa
en teorizaciones de Melanie Klein. Tomando en cuenta estas consideraciones, nos
dirigimos a algunos desarrollos de Freud
y Lacan para despejar la disparidad de los
cuerpos pulsional y narcisista: al eclipse,
en el campo del amor narcisista, de las dimensiones del Otro y del objeto causa puede contraponerse el tratamiento del objeto
característico del plano pulsional. El límite
autoerótico de la pulsión, figurado en la
reversibilidad consumada de la carne, oficia de modelo que tomamos finalmente en consideración para exponer por contraste, el estatuto de la pulsión parcial.
The methodology of this paper is theoretical. Our main objective is to examine the vision in Merleau-Ponty’s space, in order to interrogate the body beyond the specular structure of the imaginary. The failure of identity between activity and passivity can be used as a ground to analyze the body on the axis drive-phantasy. We examine how the notion of a failed reversibility can be related to the different senses of the Flesh, and we interrogate the body that is determined by the negativity of the drive. That leads us to consider the difference with the ontology of the Flesh deduced in Melanie Klein’s theory by Merleau-Ponty. Afterwards, we examine some crucial distinctions made by Freud and Lacan. They allow us to distinguish, from the point of view of the object, the body in the narcissistic field of love from the body in the domain of the drive: while in the former there is a dissolution of both the dimensions of the Other and the object as cause of desire, in the latter we face the transcendence of the object. Finally, we consider the theoretical importance of the autoerotic limit of the drive, which can be illustrated with the accompliahment of the reverbility of the Flesh.
The methodology of this paper is theoretical. Our main objective is to examine the vision in Merleau-Ponty’s space, in order to interrogate the body beyond the specular structure of the imaginary. The failure of identity between activity and passivity can be used as a ground to analyze the body on the axis drive-phantasy. We examine how the notion of a failed reversibility can be related to the different senses of the Flesh, and we interrogate the body that is determined by the negativity of the drive. That leads us to consider the difference with the ontology of the Flesh deduced in Melanie Klein’s theory by Merleau-Ponty. Afterwards, we examine some crucial distinctions made by Freud and Lacan. They allow us to distinguish, from the point of view of the object, the body in the narcissistic field of love from the body in the domain of the drive: while in the former there is a dissolution of both the dimensions of the Other and the object as cause of desire, in the latter we face the transcendence of the object. Finally, we consider the theoretical importance of the autoerotic limit of the drive, which can be illustrated with the accompliahment of the reverbility of the Flesh.
Keywords
Cuerpo, Carne, Narcisismo, Pulsión, Imaginario