¿De qué se habla cuando se habla de territorio?
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2019
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Escuela de Trabajo Social. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
Abstract
Description
El presente artículo resulta una
primera aproximación al estado del
arte existente dentro de la producción
teórica de las Ciencias Sociales
durante las últimas décadas, en
torno a la noción de “territorio” y, al
mismo tiempo, un ejercicio teórico
de explicitación de la vinculación
de dicha noción con las líneas de
investigación en curso del equipo
en el que la autora se inscribe. Lo
motiva la necesidad de revisión y
especificación de un concepto nodal
para muchas investigaciones del
ámbito de nuestras disciplinas en las
que el mismo es utilizado y tratado de
modo vago, polisémico y sin mayores
precisiones teórico conceptuales que
permitan posicionarse o distanciarse
de acepciones que no se adecúen a la
propia perspectiva. Se intenta aportar
a la comprensión del postulado
sostenido por el PEC que expresa que
la “economía popular” –universo
de estudio sobre el que versan
nuestras líneas de investigación- se
encuentra territorializada. Asimismo,
procuraremos despuntar algunos
aportes que desde las ciencias sociales
pueden ofrecerse específicamente
tanto a los profesionales dedicados
a la sociología urbana como a la
arquitectura y el urbanismo, en
lo referido a pensar el territorio
y las consecuencias prácticas
que toda perspectiva teórica
por la que se opta conlleva.
The present article is a first approximation to the existing academic production of the social sciences during the last decades, around the notion of “territory” and, at the same time, a theoretical exercise of explanation of the link between this notion and the research lines of the academic group in which the author enrolls. It is motivated by the need of revision and specification of a nodal concept for many researches in the field of our disciplines in which it is used and treated in a vague, polysemic way, and without major theoretical precision that allows positioning or distancing from meanings that don’t reflect researches’s perspective. We try to contribute to the understanding of the postulate sustained by the PEC that expresses “popular economy” -the universe on which our research lines are basedis territorialized. Also, we will try to highlight some contributions from the social sciences that can be offer specifically to professionals dedicated to urban sociology as well as to architecture and urbanism, in what refers to thinking territory and practical consequences of the perspective we adopt.
The present article is a first approximation to the existing academic production of the social sciences during the last decades, around the notion of “territory” and, at the same time, a theoretical exercise of explanation of the link between this notion and the research lines of the academic group in which the author enrolls. It is motivated by the need of revision and specification of a nodal concept for many researches in the field of our disciplines in which it is used and treated in a vague, polysemic way, and without major theoretical precision that allows positioning or distancing from meanings that don’t reflect researches’s perspective. We try to contribute to the understanding of the postulate sustained by the PEC that expresses “popular economy” -the universe on which our research lines are basedis territorialized. Also, we will try to highlight some contributions from the social sciences that can be offer specifically to professionals dedicated to urban sociology as well as to architecture and urbanism, in what refers to thinking territory and practical consequences of the perspective we adopt.
Keywords
Territorio, Territorialidad, Ciencias sociales, Urbanismo, Territory, Urbanism, Social sciences