Lo común a todos como espacio de conflicto y de división. “La singularidad de la política, lo político y la democracia en Ranciere y en Mouffe”
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2017-12
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SeIDeSoC
Abstract
Description
A pesar de las diferencias que
recorren a Jacques Ranciere y a
Chantal Mouffe, existen ideas-fuerza
que vinculan sus reflexiones,
indicativas de un estado teórico y
político en la Teoría Política actual.
En ambos autores, hay una
interlocución argumentativa que
señala cómo se ha venido
produciendo un pensamiento
generalizado sobre la supervivencia
de “un mundo” uniformemente
democrático, liberal y capitalista.
En este sentido, reponen una
pregunta de la Teoría Política sobre
cómo entender la política en
relación al poder: ¿qué sería la
democracia si no se pregunta por la
constitución del cuerpo político, si
no se cuestiona la construcción de
un espacio público entendido como
lugar que enlaza a los hombres y como gobierno de la ciudad, y si no
interpela si es posible y cómo es la
distribución de lo común?
In spite of the differences that cross Jacques Ranciere and Chantal Mouffe, there exist ideas-forces that link his reflections, indicative of a theoretical and political condition in the current Political Theory. In both authors, there is an argumentative dialogue that indicates how one has come producing a thought generalized on the survival of "a world" uniformly democratic, liberal and capitalist. In that sense, they bring a question of the Political Theory on how understanding the politics in relation to the power: what would be the democracy if it does not question for the constitution of the political body, if it does not question the construction of a public space understood as place that connects the men and as government of the city, and if it does not interpellate if it is possible and how is it the distribution of the common thing?
In spite of the differences that cross Jacques Ranciere and Chantal Mouffe, there exist ideas-forces that link his reflections, indicative of a theoretical and political condition in the current Political Theory. In both authors, there is an argumentative dialogue that indicates how one has come producing a thought generalized on the survival of "a world" uniformly democratic, liberal and capitalist. In that sense, they bring a question of the Political Theory on how understanding the politics in relation to the power: what would be the democracy if it does not question for the constitution of the political body, if it does not question the construction of a public space understood as place that connects the men and as government of the city, and if it does not interpellate if it is possible and how is it the distribution of the common thing?
Keywords
Teoría política, Poder, Conflicto, Democracia