Interludio
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021-06-23
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes. Centro de Estudios de Teoría y Crítica Literaria
Abstract
Description
Las interpretaciones del juego oscilan entre considerarlo un ‘hacer
de cuenta que’ y un ‘hacer una y otra vez’. Lo que permanece impensado en
un caso y otro es el ‘hacer’ mismo, el mero hacer que el juego lleva en ambas
y que en ambas tácitamente lo define. Al interrogar el hacer propio del juego
no encontramos un hacer entre otros sino el hacer como puro hacer, es decir,
como ese hacer sin hacer que tal vez define el hacer del arte.
Interpretations of play oscillate between considering it ‘play pretend' and 'doing over and over again'. What remains unthought in both cases is the 'doing' itself, the mere doing that playing carries in both cases and that in both cases defines it tacitly. When interrogating the doing of playing itself, we do not find a doing among others but the doing as pure doing, that is to say, as that doing without doing that perhaps defines the doing of art.
Interpretations of play oscillate between considering it ‘play pretend' and 'doing over and over again'. What remains unthought in both cases is the 'doing' itself, the mere doing that playing carries in both cases and that in both cases defines it tacitly. When interrogating the doing of playing itself, we do not find a doing among others but the doing as pure doing, that is to say, as that doing without doing that perhaps defines the doing of art.
Keywords
Juego, Hacer, Arte, Kafka